After researching dozens of models on the market, we purchased the 12 most promising electric toothbrush heads available today. If you are looking for the best toothbrush head for your electric toothbrush, we have you covered. Our team of experts rigorously tested each one to determine which left our pearly whites the cleanest and brightest, which lasted the longest, and which offered the best bang for the buck. Our review distills the information you need to sort through the overwhelming number of options out there so you can feel confident with your next purchase.
Along with the toothbrushes, our experts have tested a variety of personal care products. From mouthwash to razors to our favorite facial toners, we can help you find what works for your needs.
Editor’s Note: This article was updated on June 20, 2023, to edit for clarity.
Quick Look
The Best Toothbrush Heads
Full results from testing 12 top products are in our Product Comparison Table and Analysis & Test Results sections.
Best Overall Toothbrush Head
Philips Sonicare Genuine DiamondClean
Replacement Frequency: 3 months | Color ID Ring: No
The Philips Sonicare Genuine DiamondClean is a top-notch cleaning machine. This model has a diamond-shaped bristle pattern, which allows the brusher to effectively navigate between teeth better than any other brush we tested. Though it is labeled as a medium firmness, full-sized head, we found that the bristles are comparatively soft, and the stem is slender, making it a solid option for people with smaller mouths. It has indicator bristles that fade when it is time to replace it and fits all Sonicare click-on handle electric toothbrushes.
We don’t have many complaints about this toothbrush head. However, we should note that it is a brand name replacement head, so it will typically cost more than off-brand products. Although it didn’t perform as well on molar chewing surfaces as it did between teeth, its performance is exceptional. Another minor inconvenience we discovered is that the heads lack a color ID ring and all look identical. If you share a brush base with someone else, you’ll have to find a different way to tell them apart. However, if you are a Philips Sonicare user (or would like to be), this brush head is our top recommendation for most people.
Best Bang for the Buck
Brushmo Replacement
Replacement Frequency: 3 months | Color ID Ring: No
The Brushmo Replacement for Philips Sonicare models has excellent performance at an affordable price. It fits on at least 13 different Sonicare toothbrush handles, and its cleaning performance is solid and reliable. It comes with a set of concave bristles that conform around curved tooth surfaces, and it models the shape of its bristle clusters after the brand name equivalent. It did better during testing than a couple of name-brand models, and the price-per-brush-head is one of the lowest we have seen.
Although it performed admirably during testing, this model was not as effective at reaching plaque between teeth as some other options in our lineup. It does have high compatibility with Sonicare brushes, but the head just doesn’t fit as snuggly as name brand versions — there is a larger gap between the head and handle. If the cost of a name-brand brush head is prohibitive, this toothbrush head will do the job at a fraction of the price.
Best Budget Round Heads
Voguish Replacement Heads Compatible with Oral B
Replacement Frequency: 3 months | Color ID Ring: Yes
The Voguish Replacement Heads Compatible with Oral B is a top contender. It has excellent versatility and is compatible with over 16 different toothbrush models. We also like that it comes with different color-coded rings at the base so that you can tell multiple brushes apart if family members use the same handle. Its round head oscillates around teeth to clean surfaces just as well as name-brand versions, and its price-per-brush is one of the lowest in the category.
The caveat with its cleaning is that it doesn’t get in between teeth quite as well, leaving some noticeable plaque behind. The comparatively thick stem was also noteworthy during testing; it’s more substantial than brushes that fit on the Sonicare line, so this is not an excellent option for people with smaller mouths. Despite the claim, we didn’t find that these bristles were especially soft. However, if you are a committed Oral-B user and want a solid alternative to pricey name-brand brush heads, this is your best bet.
Best Oral-B Option
Oral-B EB50
Replacement Frequency: 3 months | Color ID Ring: Yes
The Oral-B EB50 is our top toothbrush head for the Oral-B brand. What initially seemed like a gimmick turned out to be a practical innovation to the bristle pattern. Namely, rather than sticking out perpendicular to the brush stem, most of them are angled differently. It is compatible with most Oral-B handles, and the circular, oscillating head covers an entire molar. With just a slight wrist rotation, the bristles effectively find their way between teeth at the gumline.
Our testers reported that the thicker stem of this brush left a wider opening in their mouths for toothpaste to drip out while brushing. While it is effective at cleaning, we did notice the bristles are somewhat firmer than the other top contenders. This isn’t bad per se; it’s just worth noting for those who have sensitive gums. If you are an Oral-B enthusiast and you want the most effective brush for your handle, this is the one we recommend trying.
Best for Small Mouths
Philips Sonicare Genuine C2
Replacement Frequency: 3 months | Color ID Ring: No
The Philips Sonicare Genuine C2 is a slender, compact brush head that is great for small mouths. We like the tightly clustered, soft bristles, which do an excellent job of navigating both broad tooth surfaces as well as between teeth at the gumline. This model comes with blue indicator bristles that fade when it is time to change the brush. It is also compatible with a variety of brush handles.
The downsides of this brush are relative. During testing, we found that our standard two-minute brushing timer wasn’t always quite enough to get through a complete and thorough cleaning. We also noticed the head itself is comparatively small, so if you have large teeth, it won’t cover all of that real estate very efficiently. However, if you have small teeth, a small mouth, or both, you’ll find the comfort and cleaning capability are near the top of the pack.
“>
Product Comparison Table
Why Trust GearLab
Our review process started with thorough research into the market to assess what was available. After selecting the toothbrush heads we wanted to test, we purchased them all at retail price and got to brushing. The models in this review have been through it all. We use a rigorous side-by-side process, and our testers brushed and brushed with each one, noting how much plaque each one removed under varied conditions and how comfortable the brushes are to use. We employed plaque-disclosing tablets that highlight plaque and make it possible to see what a brush has removed.
Our testing of toothbrush heads is divided between two different metrics:
- Cleaning (55% of overall score weighting)
- Comfort (45% weighting)
At GearLab, we buy the products that we test at retail prices. Austin Palmer and David Wise have been leading the electric toothbrush program at GearLab, and lead reviewer, Ben Applebaum-Bauch has been testing and writing reviews for four years, researching dozens of oral hygiene products and bathroom accessories in that time. For this review, we consulted with dental professionals about our tests and results. We also took an aggregate from a wide range of users for metrics like comfort to get a more accurate and holistic picture of how well each brush head performed. The most important thing to remember, though, is that you should brush for the American Dental Association’s recommended two minutes, twice a day, regardless of what toothbrush head you end up using.
Analysis and Test Results
We assess the toothbrush heads in this review in a couple of metrics. Each model has gone through the same hands-on, real-world testing to determine how it ranks in cleaning capability as well as comfort for the brushed.
What’s the Best Value?
When we talk about value, we are comparing the overall score that a product earns in our testing relative to its cost. Brush heads with high scores and a lower price have greater value. In this case, there are a couple of models that stand out to us.
The Brushmo Replacement Toothbrush Head offers excellent cleaning at a bargain price point for an electric toothbrush head, and the Voguish Replacement Toothbrush Heads are not far behind. In terms of brand names, the EB50 is the most cost-effective offering from Oral-B and Philips-Sonicare has the DiamondClean, all of which offer excellent value.
“>
Cleaning
Cleaning capability is defined as the degree to which a toothbrush head can remove visible plaque between teeth and at the gumline. After three meals and 12 hours of not brushing — for each model –testers chewed a plaque indicator tablet, then brushed and compared before and after results.
Top performers in this metric thoroughly removed visible plaque. The Philips Sonicare DiamondClean HX6062/95 uses a unique diamond bristle pattern and fine-tip point that did indeed make a difference and resulted in the least visible plaque after use. It was especially effective in hard-to-reach areas at the back of the mouth and between teeth at the gumline. The bristle clusters at the top and bottom come to fine points, making it possible to precisely maneuver the brush between teeth.
“>
In the second tier, the Oral-B Cross Action EB50 and the Philips Sonicare HX9023/65 C2 also knocked it out of the park. The Cross Action was a pleasant surprise, removing almost all of the visible plaque with its firmer bristles and efficient circular head, which did a thorough job of surrounding each tooth. The unique angle of the bristles also helps cover more surface area efficiently. The HX9023/65 C2 has soft bristles and uses a similar bristle cluster style as the DiamondClean; they are flatter and gently fan out to cover the surface area. Though this model performed very well, it just didn’t quite hit all of the same nooks and crannies as the DiamondClean.
“>
